Creator Content Policy
Last Updated: April 14, 2026
What This Policy Is
EduLibra is a marketplace for educational content. This Policy describes what we ask of Publishers who create and distribute content on the platform. It applies alongside the Terms of Service and Publisher Agreement, and is incorporated into each of those documents by reference.
Our approach to content starts with a simple premise: we are not the arbiter of what counts as valuable, true, or worth teaching. Publishers publish; Subscribers choose; we build the marketplace that connects them. This Policy exists to keep that marketplace honest — not to narrow what can be said on it.
The EduLibra Standard
We do not pre-screen content for accuracy. We do not rank viewpoints. We do not decide which historical interpretations, scientific framings, religious perspectives, or political philosophies deserve a place on the platform. Those decisions belong to Publishers who create, and to Subscribers who choose — whether those Subscribers are adult learners, parents, older students, schools, or districts.
What we do ask of Publishers is this: describe what you are offering honestly, so that every Subscriber — whatever their context — can make an informed decision about whether your content fits their needs. That is the foundation of a functioning marketplace, and it is what makes a broad content policy possible without the platform becoming a gatekeeper.
This Policy is organized around that idea. A narrow set of hard rules covers content that is illegal, endangers children, or threatens the integrity of the marketplace itself. Everything else is a question of honest disclosure and good-faith labeling.
Content We Do Not Allow
The following are hard rules. They are not about viewpoint, perspective, or pedagogy. They are about legality, safety, and basic marketplace integrity.
Illegal content
Do not publish content that is unlawful under applicable law, or that facilitates illegal conduct. This includes content that violates export controls, sanctions, or other regulatory regimes EduLibra is subject to.
Content that sexualizes or endangers minors
There is no exception to this. We do not permit child sexual abuse material, sexually suggestive content involving minors, grooming content, or any material that could reasonably be used to facilitate harm to children. This rule applies regardless of the Publisher’s stated purpose and regardless of educational framing.
Sexually explicit content
Pornographic or sexually explicit content is not permitted on the platform. Educational content that addresses human sexuality, reproductive health, or related subjects is permitted when offered in a clearly educational context with appropriate labeling.
Direct incitement and credible threats
Do not publish content that is intended to, and likely to, incite imminent violence against identifiable people, or content that constitutes a credible threat.
Defamation of identifiable individuals
Do not publish false statements of fact about identifiable real people that are likely to harm their reputation. You may critique, disagree with, analyze, and interpret the words and actions of public figures. You may not fabricate facts about them.
Intellectual property infringement
Do not publish content you do not have the right to publish. Respect copyright, trademarks, and licensed materials. If you use third-party content under fair use, a Creative Commons license, or another permission, provide appropriate attribution.
Fraud, deception, and impersonation
Do not misrepresent who you are, what you are selling, or what Subscribers are getting. Do not impersonate others, fabricate credentials, or make false claims about accreditation, endorsements, or outcomes.
Malware and platform abuse
Do not publish malicious code, phishing material, or content designed to compromise security. Do not use the Services to interfere with, disrupt, or abuse the platform itself.
Spam
Do not use the Services to distribute unsolicited bulk content, to manipulate rankings or recommendations, or to generate artificial engagement.
Honest Disclosure
Beyond those hard rules, most of what we ask of Publishers comes down to honest labeling. Subscribers on EduLibra span a wide range — adult self-learners choosing content for themselves, parents selecting materials for their children, older students making their own educational choices, and schools and districts making decisions for entire learner populations. Each of those Subscribers is capable of deciding what fits their context, but only if you tell them what you are offering.
Describe your content accurately
Your title, summary, and description should reflect what the content actually contains. If your lesson on the American Revolution takes a particular interpretive stance, say so. If your biology curriculum is designed for a religious school context, say so. If your economics course is rooted in a specific school of thought, say so. We do not ask Publishers to water down their perspective — we ask them to be upfront about it.
Indicate the audience you designed for
Tell Subscribers who your content is for. This may include grade-band indications for K–12 materials, reading-level indicators, prerequisites, intended use settings (classroom, independent study, homeschool, adult learning), and any other signals that would help someone decide whether the material fits their situation. You set the audience — we ask you to communicate it clearly.
Flag material that some Subscribers will want to know about in advance
Some content addresses topics that different Subscribers will react to differently. Violence in historical narrative, sexuality in health education, substance use in prevention content, graphic language in primary-source literature, strong political or religious positions in humanities material — none of these is off-limits, and we do not ask you to remove them. We do ask that your description gives Subscribers enough information to decide for themselves whether the material fits their context.
Disclose AI involvement
If generative AI played a substantial role in creating your content — for example, if an AI system authored the core instructional text or generated a substantial portion of the assessment questions — say so in the description. You do not need to flag minor AI use (such as spell-check, grammar correction, or formatting help), and you do not need to catalog every tool you used. The standard is honesty about what Subscribers are paying for and learning from.
Perspective, Interpretation, and Debate
Education is a place where reasonable people disagree. Historians disagree about the causes of wars. Scientists disagree about the implications of their findings. Philosophers disagree about almost everything. Religious and secular traditions offer different frameworks for thinking about the world. These disagreements are not failures of education — they are part of what education is.
EduLibra does not take sides in these debates. We do not label one framing as correct and another as misinformation. We do not privilege one tradition, school of thought, or interpretive lens. A young-earth creation curriculum and a secular-evolutionary biology curriculum can both exist on the platform. A Marxist economics course and an Austrian-school economics course can both exist on the platform. A civics curriculum emphasizing originalism and one emphasizing living-constitutionalism can both exist on the platform.
What we ask is that each Publisher be transparent about where their content is coming from, so that Subscribers can choose what fits their context. A biology teacher in a public school and a science teacher at a religious school should each be able to find what they need on EduLibra and know what they are getting.
This does not mean anything goes. The hard rules above still apply. And publishing false statements of fact about identifiable real people, deceiving Subscribers about what they are buying, or using the platform to incite violence are not matters of perspective — they are violations.
Topics That Commonly Raise Questions
A few subject areas come up often enough that it is worth being explicit about how this Policy applies to them.
Violence and conflict
Historical, literary, and current-events content frequently involves violence. This is not a reason to avoid the material. It is a reason to describe the material accurately, so Subscribers know what they are choosing.
Sexuality, reproductive health, and identity
Educational content on these topics is permitted across the range of perspectives that exist in mainstream curricula and communities. Pornographic or explicit content is not. Between those poles, describe your framing honestly and let Subscribers decide what fits.
Substance use
Prevention education, harm-reduction content, and historical or literary material involving substance use are all permitted. Content that instructs or encourages illegal drug manufacture or consumption is not.
Mental health and self-harm
Educational content on mental health, including material that addresses suicide, eating disorders, or self-harm in a prevention, clinical, or educational framing, is permitted. Content that promotes, glamorizes, or provides instruction for self-harm is not. Where content addresses these topics, a brief note in the description helps Subscribers make informed choices.
Politics, religion, and worldview
Educational content on political, religious, and philosophical subjects spans the full range of human thought. All of it can exist on EduLibra. We do not rank traditions, we do not prefer one framework over another, and we do not require Publishers to present “both sides” of anything. We do ask Publishers to be honest about where they are coming from.
Contested empirical and scientific topics
On empirical questions where reasonable people disagree — whether within scientific communities, across scientific and religious frameworks, or across ideological traditions — EduLibra does not adjudicate. Publishers offer what they believe is educationally valuable, describe it honestly, and let Subscribers choose.
Assessments and Testing Content
Content designed as assessments — tests, quizzes, answer keys, exam preparation with specific items — has particular integrity considerations. If you publish assessment content, take reasonable steps to prevent its unintended circulation, label it as assessment material, and follow any licensing restrictions that accompanied source materials you used.
If you operate under formal testing security frameworks (for example, for standardized-test prep materials under a licensing relationship), you are responsible for complying with those frameworks. EduLibra does not assume responsibility for testing security relationships you have with third parties.
Real People in Your Materials
Educational content often references real people — historical figures, public figures, authors, scientists, other educators. That is normal, and nothing in this Policy restricts it, subject to the defamation rule above.
When your content references or depicts identifiable students, specific classrooms, specific schools, or other private individuals — for example, in case studies, example student work, photographs, or video — you are responsible for having the permissions and releases you need. This includes obtaining parental consent where applicable for minors. Do not publish identifiable information about private individuals without authorization.
Accessibility
Making content usable by learners with disabilities is part of doing this work well. EduLibra provides tools and guidance to help Publishers produce accessible materials, and the Publisher Agreement (§9.5) addresses Publishers’ accessibility responsibilities. We encourage Publishers to exceed the minimum, particularly when selling into institutional contexts where accessibility is legally required.
How We Enforce This Policy
We rely first on Publishers. Your representations and warranties in the Publisher Agreement commit you to compliance with this Policy, and your signals to Subscribers — titles, descriptions, labels — do most of the work of matching content to the right audiences. Most of the time, that is enough.
When it is not enough, we may act. We may remove or restrict content, adjust its visibility or discoverability, require changes to descriptions or labels, suspend monetization, or suspend or terminate accounts. We follow the approach described in the Trust & Safety page and the Publisher Agreement. Our posture is to intervene narrowly and only where intervention is warranted — not to second-guess Publisher judgment on matters of perspective or pedagogy.
Publishers who believe an enforcement action was made in error may appeal through the process described in the Trust & Safety page.
Reporting Concerns
If you believe content on EduLibra violates this Policy, please let us know at support@edulibra.com. Include the specific content, a description of the concern, and any relevant context. Reports that identify potential violations of the hard rules — particularly anything involving the safety of minors — should flag that urgency in the subject line.
We review reports in good faith. We do not act on reports that simply reflect disagreement with a Publisher’s perspective, framing, or interpretation. We do act on credible reports of rule violations.
Changes to This Policy
We may update this Policy from time to time. When we do, we will update the “Last Updated” date. Material changes will be communicated through the Services or by other reasonable means.
Contact
EduLibra, Inc.
455 Market St Ste 1940 PMB 703322
San Francisco, CA 94105-2448